<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When five is not enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravitycollapse.com/2009/01/when-five-is-not-enough/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravitycollapse.com/2009/01/when-five-is-not-enough</link>
	<description>from Marc's brain to yours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:42:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miss Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.gravitycollapse.com/2009/01/when-five-is-not-enough/comment-page-1#comment-7868</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 06:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitycollapse.com/2009/01/when-five-is-not-enough#comment-7868</guid>
		<description>I refuse to type &quot;LOL&quot; but I did, in fact, laugh out loud when I read this. I rate the hundreds and hundreds of books I read on scale of 1-5 (and log them with author, title, first sentence, last sentence, review, notes on the edition, index of good quotes, etc.). I have yet to transfer these logs from old fashioned PAPER journal format to a database, but I already know that the books are mostly ALL FRIGGIN 3&#039;s! At some point last year I started cheating and using decimals. You have helped me recognize that when I do go digital, I&#039;ll have to just admit defeat and go to a 10-point rating system. If you go to a 20 or 50 point system, or weighted excel algorithm, or other such viral, compelling OCD nonsense -- PLEASE DO NOT MENTION IT IN MY PRESENCE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I refuse to type &#8220;LOL&#8221; but I did, in fact, laugh out loud when I read this. I rate the hundreds and hundreds of books I read on scale of 1-5 (and log them with author, title, first sentence, last sentence, review, notes on the edition, index of good quotes, etc.). I have yet to transfer these logs from old fashioned PAPER journal format to a database, but I already know that the books are mostly ALL FRIGGIN 3&#8217;s! At some point last year I started cheating and using decimals. You have helped me recognize that when I do go digital, I&#8217;ll have to just admit defeat and go to a 10-point rating system. If you go to a 20 or 50 point system, or weighted excel algorithm, or other such viral, compelling OCD nonsense &#8212; PLEASE DO NOT MENTION IT IN MY PRESENCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
